Subscribe to the blog!  

And, STOP Calling Me a Non-Profit!

If the very compelling speakers at a recent industry workshop for the AFP (Association of Fundraising Professionals) have their way, not-for-profits would find themselves equal to — if not superior to — the “for-profits” with whom they compete for resources.

The keynote speaker and author, Lynne Twist, offers up a positive re-naming for this industry — “Social Profit.” Equally persuasive was guest speaker, Harvard grad Jennifer Craig, who offered “For Purpose” as a better description.

Let’s think about this.

Exactly why are “non-profits” considered second-tier? Why should a “corporate” business card trump one that reads “non-profit?” Why are (relatively speaking) so fewer dollars directed to social good than to commerce and industry?

The distinction between giving and investing.

It’s easy enough to grasp “for profit” because that’s, well, what investment is all about. Pure (or, impure) and simple.

You invest your money in a company or its stock and expect a moderate, hopefully handsome, return. Your cash is the fuel that generates the manufacture of more gadgets, items and stuff to make the world go ’round.

But, there’s also that guy (or gal) at the door who wants you to put your money, along with your heart, into something which will not generate a… profit. The money you give only, kinda, really, helps people, somewhere.

Another Reason to Attend Occupy’s 2014 National Gathering – Free Placement on a Watch List! (7 Possible Ways)

Yep, it’s true…and least in theory.

If a report by Jeremy Scahill and Ryan Devereaux outlining governmental guidelines for placing people on a network of terror watch lists has a basis in fact, more than a few Occupy Wall Street faithful may be subject to “Big Brother’s” unwelcome attention.

The location for the “NatGat3” festivity will be Sacramento, CA, from July 31 to August 3. The purpose will be to celebrate Occupy’s third year of existence. The intention is to peacefully protest the many ills of our nation and provide educational workshops to redress these problems.

So far, so good. Where’s the problem?

Rather than posing that question individually to the 19 federal agencies which, secretly, have “profiled” (Isn’t that illegal?) individuals as threats or potential threats to national security, let me simply quote from “The Seven Possible Ways” list that Scahill and Devereaux put together.

This is not an idle exercise on our part.  A number of Occupiers just may, in some Orwellian fashion, qualify for this distinction. After all, according to Huffington Post Blogger Nick Wing, out of some 468,749 watch-list nominations submitted to the National Counterterrorism Center, only 1% were rejected. He did note, however, that this grand list of thousands of people was of no apparent value in catching legitimate threats like the Boston Marathon bombers.

Let’s take a look at these government-mandated categories and not cut Occupiers any slack. Let the dots connect where they may. So, with a tip of the hat and thank-you to blogger Wing and researchers Scahill and Devereaux, here are The Seven Ways:

1. Reasonable Suspicion. (Irrefutable evidence or concrete facts not required)

Now, this requires a “nominator.” This is kinda like the Academy Awards I would guess, but not as complimentary. Whoever these people are, whatever their credentials, they are expected to rely on intelligence or information from whatever source and then allowed to infer possible links to “terrorism.”

2. Post something on Facebook or Twitter that raises “reasonable suspicion”

Kinda squishy ground here, even by East German Stasi standards of nosiness.

Department guidelines do dictate that Occupiers (even you and I) are to be forgiven for engaging in “constitutionally protected activities,” providing there is nothing to raise suspicion. Experience appears to show, however, that some posts are more suspicious than others. TeaBaggers can plot against Big Gov, southerners can demand secession and gun owners can wave their AK-47’s around at the local K-Mart, but heaven forbid that a criticism of government policies or Big Biz come from a “lefty” or social activist.  Now, that is suspicious!

3. Somebody else could think you’re a potential terror threat

Watchlist guidelines also invite the submission of “walk-in” or “write-in” tidbits about potential candidates for their scrutiny. Remember that jerk you last fought with on FB? What he has to report on you is welcome fodder. And, you know from the start that this guy will be awarded more credibility than will you. After all, YOU are the suspected terrorist. He/She said so.

4. You could be a little terror-ish…again, according to someone

The article continues, “The document explains that you could be put on a suspected-terrorist watch list if you are determined to be a “representative” of a terrorist group even if you have “neither membership in nor association with the organization.”

Don’t make the mistake of “liking” a group on FB that reeks of terrorism. You know, like Quakers, Catholic Workers, Greenpeace and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), all of whom have been under FBI surveillance from time to time. Did I mention Martin Luther King?

5. You could just know someone terrorist-y, maybe

It just got personal, and this is where I might lose relatives and get heavily de-friended throughout Social Media. How so? If I were to be connected in some fashion to a suspected terrorist, the system can allow for my immediate family to be added to the TIDE (Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment) list, even if they may not be under suspicion themselves. (My grandchildren would never forgive me if they are stopped at Disneyland’s door.)

6. You’re in a “category” of people determined to be a threat

It is well documented that Homeland Security found OWS to be deserving of special attention. A Rolling Stone article in 2012 uncovered a DHS report titled: “SPECIAL COVERAGE: Occupy Wall Street.” The directive acknowledged the historically peaceful nature of the movement, but “notes darkly that ‘large scale demonstrations also carry the potential for violence, presenting a significant challenge for law enforcement.’”

In their effort to confirm someone/something to be suspicions, the DHS reportedly scoured OWS-related Twitter feeds to gather proof, “going so far as to provide an interactive map ‘of protests and gatherings nationwide – borrowed, improbably enough, from the lefty blog Daily Kos,’” the RS reporter determined.

What Rolling Stone found to be most ominous, however, came in the final paragraph of the report.

“The growing support for the OWS movement has expanded the protests’ impact and increased the potential for violence. While the peaceful nature of the protests has served so far to mitigate their impact, larger numbers and support from groups such as Anonymous substantially increase the risk for potential incidents and enhance the potential security risk to critical infrastructure (CI).

The continued expansion of these protests also places an increasingly heavy burden on law enforcement and movement organizers to control protesters…”

There it is – “control protestors.”

Where is it called for in the constitution that when people exercise their First Amendment rights to peaceful dissent, who detail in advance a list of their activities and do all that they can to obtain requisite permits, need to be “controlled.”

Our news outlets generally reserve that description for the authorities and police in Russia, or Egypt, or Iran…not in Sacramento, CA.

7. Finally, you could be “unlucky”

With 1.5 million people added to the list over the past several years, mistakes can – and do – happen. Your last name is misspelled. You booked a one-way flight at the last minute and walked on without luggage.  Perhaps you were passing by a protest rally and got noticed by an all-seeing eye-in-the-sky.

Whatever the cause, you have no way of learning that you are on a watch list.  Or, if you do discover that to be the case, taking your name off of it. This is understandable, in a tortured form of logic. The government cannot tell you that you are on a “secret” list….it’s secret! And, if they take your name off it, they can’t tell you that, either.  That would be a secret, too.  The Stasi, mentioned earlier, would be proud.

8. You could blog about this stuff (sorry, just had to throw this one in on my own)

I have no way (back to secrets, again) of knowing if my Huffington Post blogger fans are largely comprised of Homeland Security, the NYPD, the FBI or the SPCA. I’m just happy to have fans. But, what if they notice that I – inadvertently and innocently I remind you – fit into any of those seven earlier descriptions?

What if Governor Brown didn’t like my recent blog wondering how welcome the Occupy National Gathering might be in his capital, and he told the gatekeepers at Disney?

Which is why, Occupy National Gathering of 2014, I sadly send regrets for my choosing not being there.

I am certain you will understand. I have grandchildren to protect.

Happy 95th Birthday Today, Pete Seeger – and That Calls for a Festival!

Mark the dates – Thursday, July 17 to Monday, July 21. Hudson Valley & New York City.

It was an NYC invite-only press invitation gladly accepted earlier this week by broadcast and print media to learn about – and report on – the first-ever Festival/Tribute to be held in honor of the life and contributions of Pete and Toshi Seeger.

“Seeger.” The name alone commands respect. And now, the press learned, that name is going to be further honored by the creation of a festival to celebrate this man’s placement in history. At least, if Pete and Toshi’s grandson, Kitama Cahill-Jackson and a core of Seeger family members and friends have anything to say about it.

They were there in force. Tom Chapin, The Chapin Sisters, Emma’s Revolution, Rick Nestler, Aurora Brown, Hip Hop artist and poet Nyraine and DJ Kool Herc, all stepping up to the microphone to pay tribute and show support. They will be among a score of musicians who will sing and play at the upcoming fest.

Performances and Protest – Synonymous With Pete Seeger

Think of the occasions through the years. The festivals of Clearwater, Strawberry Festival, Newport Folk Festival (he was a founder), Farm Aid, benefit concerts for migrant workers, college coffee houses, churches, summer camps, world tours, New Orleans Jazz Fest, Union Halls, Carnegie Hall, the Vietnam Moratorium Day, Lincoln Center…any place and time where peace and hope needed to be championed.

Think of the people he sang with, or whose music he influenced. The Weavers, the Kingston Trio, Peter, Paul and Mary, Joan Baez, Woody Guthrie, Burl Ives, Lee Hays, Cisco Houston, The Byrds, Johnny Cash, June Carter, Buffy Sainte-Marie, Tom Paxton, Judy Collins, The Smothers Brothers, Bob Dylan, Theodore Bikel, Odetta, Don McLean, Bruce Springsteen, and on and on.

Think of the songs he wrote or made famous. If I had a Hammer. Turn Turn Turn. Where Have All the Flowers Gone? Waist Deep in the Big Muddy. Midnight Special. What Did You Learn In School Today? Little Boxes. Guantanamera. This Land is Your Land. Worried Man Blues. Kisses Sweeter Than Wine. La Qunice Brigada, And, of course, the anthem: We Shall Overcome.

Think of the travails he endured and overcome. They came early and lasted late. His early membership and experience in the communist party, his work on behalf of labor unions, pioneering integrated casts of musicians, and musical lyrics which called for peace instead of war caused him to be the target for right-of-center politicians and the John Birchers of that day.

That continuing, corrosive assault caused his work and his patriotism to be questioned and attacked, resulting in a blacklisting of his famous singing group, The Weavers, and radio stations refused to play their music and bookings were cancelled.  The McCarthy era ramped up the venom.

On August 18, 1955, Pete Seeger was subpoenaed to testify before the HUAC (House Un-American Activities Committee) where he refused to plead the Fifth Amendment. Rather, he stood on his First Amendment rights of free speech.  The 1957 indictment (from a body itself contemptible – much as today), he was convicted in a jury trial for contempt of congress. In May, 1962, an appeals court ruled the indictment to be flawed and the conviction was overturned.

Blacklisted and unemployable in the industry, he and Toshi survived by earning money as music teachers in summer camps and travelling the college circuit. And, this is where he served as an essential source for the revival of folk music. Pete’s music and causes helped him to worked his way back into America’s heart (where he had never left).  We are the beneficiaries of his life’s work.

And, That Calls for a Festival!

Think of the experience you will have, attending what will surely be a musical love-fest. Artists (and expect surprise “walk-ons”) over the series will include David Avram, Tom Chapin and the Chapin Sisters, Guy Davis, Emma’s Revolution, Sarah Lee Guthrie and Johnny Irion, Kim & Reggie Harris, Hudson River Sloop Singers, Holly Near, Paul Winter Consort, The Vanaver Caravan, Dar Williams & Dan Zanes and Peter Yarrow of Peter, Paul and Mary and the famous “more.”

Here’s just a partial run-down:

Thursday, July 17 – Opens with a film screening of the Emmy-award winning documentary, Pete Seeger: The Power of Song. Pier 46 & The Hudson River. 8:30 p.m.
Friday, July 18 – Memorial Service. Bardavon Opera House, Poughkeepsie, NY. 7 p.m.
Saturday, July 19 – ALL DAY
Events throughout the Hudson Valley, song circle and potluck supper, square dancing, “Rocking the Boat,” and film-and-photography by Pete and Toshi Seeger by El Taller Latino Americano.
Sunday, July 20 – 4 p.m.
Lincoln Center Out of Doors – Memorial Concert for Pete and Toshi
Monday, July 21 – 6 p.m.
New Songs of Justice: An Evening Honoring Pete Seeger. Summer Stage, Rumsey Playfield, Central Park

(More complete details for each event can be found at:

The Founder and Executive Producer of Seeger Fest is Pete’s grandson, Kitama Cahill-Jackson, his wife, Jeannine and family friend Kalynda Klementis. The festival co-producers are Gina Belafonte, actress, activists and daughter of Harry Belafonte, Janae Desire, television producer and Jason Samel, music activist and record producer.

As described at the site:

“The Seegers were involved in nearly every cause of the twentieth century. From the labor movement to civil rights to anti-war to the environmental movement, Pete and Toshi were always on the front lines. This five day event will honor their work, remember them as people and shed light on the musicians and non-profit organizations continuing to work for a better tomorrow.”

Your presence, as part of that acknowledgment, is requested.

guitars and banjo

A Wave of Action – Or a Wave Goodbye? It’s Occupy’s Call

What will prove to be either the last gasp of the Occupy Movement, or its Renaissance as a social powerhouse, will lie in the success and its embrace of a highly-publicized #WaveOfAction which launches a major 90-day program of protest and resistance on April 4.

The Wave begins, symbolically, on the date of the assassination of Martin Luther King and ends, symbolically, on July the 4th.  It will run from the date of the death of a dream that will not die to the date of the birth of a vision which has yet to be fulfilled.

 So, what is the purpose of this ambitious campaign, who is behind it, and what can we expect of it – and of ourselves?  The purpose is stated on its website and is quite clear.

We are a Movement of Movements

“The Worldwide #WaveOfAction begins April 4th and runs through July 4th.

During this three-month cycle, people throughout the world will be protesting corruption, rallying around solutions and taking part in alternative systems. The new paradigm will be on full display.

Studies have proven that it only takes 3.5% of the population taking nonviolent action to create meaningful and positive change. The #WaveOfAction gives all of us who want change a powerful opportunity to #EvolveSociety.

Change-makers all over the world will be engaged at the same time in an unprecedented wave of transformation.”

OK, that sounds acceptable (to most of the 99%, and certainly not the 1%).  Now, who is behind this?

I confess that I can’t say that I have figured that out.  It appears to be nobody.  Or, perhaps everybody.  Or, a coterie of patriots/anarchists/misfits who – such as when Zuccotti Park came to be occupied – are taking it upon themselves to rekindle that Occupy fire.

Word has it that #OWS #Anon and its allies put out a call to action for a World Wide Wave of creative community coordination and collaboration this winter.  There were two organizing conference calls prior to April 4.  One on March 25, and the other on April 2.  (David Degraw is one of the facilitators)

For an organizing call, it attracted verifiable luminaries:  Barbara Max Hubbard, Marianne Williamson, Russell Brand, Kevin Zeese, Patricia Ellsberg, Dylan Rattigan, John Perry Barlow, and Lee Camp.  If “you are known by the company you keep,” #WaveOfAction is keeping good company.

Whoever started it, it can be said that occupiers around the world are standing with it, and many called in to declare that support and to announce events they were planning locally.

But, they are coming up against a very familiar foe – themselves.

The Naysayers…and worse

Anyone familiar with Occupy knows that it is rife with the usual suspects:  gripers, snipers and full-blown trolls whose only purpose seems to be that of making sure that “solidarity” will never be had.  “How dare (someone/something) do/be (provide the offense).”  Everything is suspect, and anyone taking a lead roll is to be suspected.   

Whether or not this will affect the success of #WaveOfAction will not be known for some time, but the offenders are being put on notice.  Activist and creater of Occu-Evolve, Sumumba Sobukwe, had this to say:  

“The Irony of those complaining about this ‘Wave of Action’ is that it will only be a failure if they continue to find fault with EVERYTHING that ‘reeks’ of coordination that might make people move beyond facebook, twitter and other social media ‘activism’ as well as their own silos of causes and interests to actually go out and organize with others in the streets.”

He continues, “When did an ‘occupy’ action ever draw more than a few hundred people that didn’t have unions, grassroots or other groups involved? Who are we fooling here? Occupy has ALWAYS been made up of different groups and individuals, and that’s where the concept of the ‘99%’ came closest to being real or at least unifying in theory.”

So, in addition to proving Pogo’s theorem, “We have met the enemy, and they are us,” what other odds militate against the campaign having any major effect?  Let me count the ways:

1. A largely indifferent press.  Activists deride the “MainStream Media” for not paying attention to even the largest of its protests and greatest of its triumphs.  Occupy is hardly alone.  Last year’s March Against Monsanto which attracted a half-million marchers or more worldwide did not find its way into print or broadcast in any meaningful way.  (P.S.  Occupy folk helped make that march happen, as well). 

.         2. A police force dedicated to crushing public dissent.  Naaaah, that can’t be happening here in America, right?  That’s what you find in Russia, or Egypt, or China.  Thank God that “to serve and protect” applies to citizens in the street and peaceful protestors, yes?  Here’s a retired cop who has a word or two on that, Captain Ray Harris. Oh, and not to forget Cecily McMillan’s experience with the Boys in Blue which finds her at risk of jail time for resisting their abuse.

3.      3.  Elected officials.  One would think that people who are elected to represent us will actually represent us, and that they will be at the front of any parade or protest demanding justice and protecting civil liberties.  Think again.  If you ain’t got the money (and few occupiers/activists do), they ain’t got the time.  And, if their party can’t co-opt your movement for their betterment, they’ll be the first to applaud authorities who arrest you. Hell, they will demand that force be used.

4.    The 1%.  You can be certain that the #WaveOfAction will be countered by a #FloodOfMoney spent to discredit its work and mission.  Did I mention Fox?  CNN?  Stay tuned and see how money talks.

So, I leave it to you, the reader.  Will this be a “Wave,” or a “Wave Goodbye” on the part of Occupy and its brother and sister causes?  Will you listen to the detractors within and the enemies without and surrender to the impossible forces against you?

Or, will you take comfort in your own, amazing numbers and brilliance and continue to fight the good fight as so many have before you in America’s history.  You are the dream that Martin referred to, and the nightmare that the 1% are waking up to.

When you realize that, the others in the 3.5% of the population will as well.  Won’t that be exciting.

Occupy Began Here




Occupy Eats its Own – Over an Iconic Poster

In a recent article published at OccupyWallStreet.Net, (informally known as “Street.Net”), the authors pulled no punches in excoriating the members of a separate Occupy-related group called the Occupy Solidarity Network, Inc. (also known as ““).

The sin?  Having the temerity (and commercial – dare I say, Capitalist – savvy) to offer for sale to the public copies of the iconic Occupy poster showing a dancing ballerina  atop the bronze Wall Street Bull in lower Manhattan.  Occupy Wall Street Iconic Poster

And, make no doubt, that image is Iconic, and the complaint somewhat justified. 

The “Dancing Ballerina” poster immediately caught the public’s attention.  It was described by one journalist and observer as “scenic, striking… and an emblem of the Occupy Wall Street Movement” and goes on to describe its origins as a creation of Vancouver based Adbusters magazine and its editor, Micah White.

Micah attempted to explain the galvanizing impact of the Dancing Ballerina: “We rely on passionate words, pertinent facts and beautiful art to try to provoke epiphanies! 

Fast-forward two-plus years and the “epiphany” of many in Occupy is that, if it is to survive, it needs the framework and lifeblood that sustains every revolutionary enterprise – organization and money.  But, not everyone in OWS is happy about that hard-won insight, and there’s the rub.

Call them the purists, or ideologues, or “hard grounders,” but a vocal number of Occupiers as evidenced by the complainers at the blog are attempting to hold the “” people to some tough and controversial standards.  They list in detail the offenses: 

1.  It’s about money.  2.  “We Are All Founders” (and ergo deserve a voice in this).  3.  A “collective resource” was misappropriated.  4.  Funds acquired are unlikely to “spark a future revolution.”  5.  This promotes the idea that money is more important than actual participation (i.e., feet on the street).

The objects of this broadside, Priscilla Grim, Justine Tunney and Micah White, have a fairly convincing argument on their side for what they are doing, and why.  But first, some history.

Justine launched the first OWS-related website in July 2011, far in advance of Zuccotti Park.  When the actual occupation of the park happened in September, 2011 and Priscilla came aboard, theirs was the only fully functional go-to website, complete with an 800#, where people could get information and immediately plug-in to the community.

Realizing that OWS was getting bigger than could have been imagined and that they needed to hold themselves accountable, they morphed into a 501(c)4 corporation in October, 2011, so they could be “as political as we wanted to be” to support direct action and media work while availing themselves a recognized legal structure. (This model was followed a year later by the highly-successful “Rolling Jubilee” organization – itself actively critiqued by some Occupiers.., by early October, had already established itself as a gateway for donations.  Donors were redirected to the NYCGA (the NYC General Assembly) and a WePay account.  They took this step purposely to keep themselves free from some of the mismanagement taking place in that body – particularly regarding the managing of funds that were flowing in from donors around the country who backed the Occupy action at that moment. 

This rankled OWS purists to no end

Even so, Priscilla asserts that all the money raised through their 501(c)4 has gone for Occupy work, “one way or another.”  Sometimes, this meant keeping people from being evicted, having their cell phones turned off, or even sending organizers to family funerals.

Long before the poster sale came into their thinking via Micha’s blessings, they had already been reaching out to the Occupy ranks to let them know that resources were available, as exampled by the Paul Robeson Freedom School which they helped sponsor and partially fund.

As for supporting their own work, prior attempts to do so were unsustainable. All the time they worked at Occupy they devoted themselves to OWS, to great personal cost. Further along, the two women attempted to do website development and then later as a contract consultancy.  No go, in either case.  The helpers were not being helped.

As for the critics?  “All those people are the ones not doing the actual work…the same people we approached to help move their organization along and who advised us to ‘just keep us posted and practice transparency’ but didn’t pitch in,” Priscilla complains.

The person who came up with the idea of marketing the poster was Micah White.  The editor at Adbusters ( for six years, he was the one to come up with the Occupy Wall Street concept and the one who created the poster and the meme.  And, as a Board Member of the Occupy Solidarity Network, he is also the person who came up with the idea of marketing the poster for fundraising purposes. 

Who owns “Occupy?”

“The U.S. Trademark office has ruled that the phrase Occupy Wall Street cannot be trademarked because it is so much a part of our lexicon now,” Priscilla explains. 

“The poster folio that was part of the Occupy Wall Street Journal is now in MOMA (Museum of Modern Art) and no one is complaining that they have to pay $20 to see that.”  She continues, “and, Adbusters sold the slick copy of that magazine for $7 a pop, and no one is going after them for profiting off this.”

After their employment drought, Priscilla is now working for a website,, and Justine got a job at Google.  Both of them have a very simple request of people within and supportive of the Occupy.

 “Buy a poster so that we don’t have to keep dipping into our salary and savings to support the movement. 2014 is when Occupy will  make a comeback.  But, in our experience, Occupy cannot do that without funding to go along with that all-important physical presence.  This can only happen when cellphones are paid for, transport and food provided, and people are sheltered.”  It’s all about survival.

Survival is important to souls like Priscilla and her cohort, Justine, as it is to a lot of dedicated activists.  These two have had to support themselves under severe circumstances since Zuccotti,  Justine had contracted cancer (Google’s insurance came in handy, here) during this time, and Priscilla and her daughter were evicted from their apartment on Christmas Day, 2012! 

Christmas Day!I wonder where her detractors were on that day?



What’s In a Name? Would You Trade Yours for Money? For Blood Money?

On a sunshine-bright day in late September in front of a cold stone building in NYC, that question was asked of Stephen Feinberg, CEO of Cerberus Capital Management – the firm that owns  a commanding 94% stake in the Freedom Group which is responsible for nearly $900 million in gun sales in the U.S.

It wasn’t a simple call-out.  It had a special importance in that it came from Rabbi Andy Bachman of Brooklyn’s Congregation Beth Elohim and it came during the Jewish festival of Sukkot: a festival in which freedom and the blessings of life are celebrated along with the need “to stay true to our word to build a safe and just world,” as the Rabbi describes it.

The Rabbi was not alone in questioning Feinberg and Cerberus Capital.

He stood to the side of a crowd of activists which included people from Mom’s Demand Action, the New Yorkers Against Gun Violence, NAACP,, the American Federation of Teachers and the Newtown Action Alliance;

Jesse Lewis - 6 Years Old

the latter comprised of neighbors and townfolk who rallied around the families of the victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School monstrous killing of 20 children and six adults last December.

His was not the only voice.

Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY) was there to eloquently demand that Cerberus keep its word.  As were Geoffrey Eaton, President, NAACP Mid-Manhattan Branch, American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten, Shannon Watts, founder of Moms Demand Action and Monte Frank, a board member of the Newtown Action Alliance.

All were eloquent, all were passionate, but Rabbi Bachman’s

Rabbi Andy Bachman

Rabbi Andy Bachman

words – the last to be spoken to the gathered crowd – were the most personal in asking Feinberg and Cerberus to keep a promise.  It was, essentially, a reminder from a brother to a brother to remember his heritage and to act from it. 

What was this broken promise, exactly? 

And, exactly what has that got to do with Stephen Feinberg’s name?  The promise was a commitment made by Cerberus shortly after the Sand Hook Elementary School Shooting to divest itself of its holdings in the Freedom Group, one of the world’s largest manufacturers and marketers of firearms.

You might recognize the name of one of their products:  Bushmaster XM-15.  This was the 30-round magazine weapon of choice used to kill and dismember the children of Sandy Hook Elementary.  The results were so horrific that the Connecticut state Legislature passed a bill modifying the state’s Freedom of Information Act in order to “prevent the release of crime-scene photos.”

That fact that the shooter used a Bushmaster did not go unnoticed by Cerberus.

“It is apparent that the Sandy Hook tragedy was a watershed event that has raised the national debate on gun control to an unprecedented level,” a statement released by the company on December 18 stated.   It continued, “There are, however, actions that we as a firm can take.  Accordingly, we have determined to immediately engage in a formal process to sell our investment in Freedom Group.”

It is two months shy of that deadly day and the carefully-worded statement from Cerberus.  And, not a penny’s worth has been divested.  In fact, it has realized hundreds millions of dollars in sales over the months since their “promise” was made.  The same period of time in which, every 30 minutes, a child is killed by a gun.  Day in.  Day out.

Freedom Group is the same arm of Cerberus which has paid out $1,000,000 to the NRA so that this group can lobby to keep deadly assault rifles on the street; the same NRA lobbyists that have enough legislators in their pocket to obstruct sensible federal gun safety legislation.

“We stand here, outside Cerberus Capital Management, in this season, to ask you, Stephen Feinberg, to reclaim your ‘good name,’ stay true to your word, and divest Cerberus Capital Management from its ownership in the Freedom Group,” Rabbi Bachman intoned.

“We ask you, Stephen Feinberg, we ask you today, what value do you really get from hundreds of millions in profits earned by the blood of innocents?  What value do you get from the profits of weapons made to kill quickly, efficiently, and without feeling?  What value do you get from assault weapons, dead children, grieving mothers, fathers, sisters and brothers?”

His ending remarks, in what had now become almost a prayer meeting

טוב שם משמן טוב–Redeem your good name, Stephen Feinberg.  Invest your profits in people’s lives, not guns that kill.  Invest in young hearts and minds, not bullets and bombs.  Not in the violent and darkened past of mankind’s evil ways but in the bright light and hopeful horizon of peaceful present day.

Redeem your good name, Stephen Feinberg.  Redeem your good name.”

“A Line in the Park” – An Occupy Invite and Plea to Prospective NYC Mayor, Bill de Blasio

Well, the tide is flowing in your favor, Bill.  Willy Thompson has conceded, and only one lonely Republican stands between you and Gracie Mansion.  And, such press coverage!

News articles describe your candidacy as “reflecting the new New York”,or less flatteringly  as an attempt to leverage the credentials of an elected office whose basic function is to “call press conferences and denounce things.”

The Nation magazine effusively endorses your candidacy as “an opportunity for New Yorkers to reimagine their city in boldly progressive ways.”

There are thrilling, progressive threads running through these accounts and voiced in your own words:  you are not going to add to the legacy of your predecessor, Michael Bloomberg.  You will tax the rich. You will not allow uncalled-for “stop and frisk.”  You will not close hospitals needlessly. You will enable affordable housing, and ensure universal pre-kindergarten. The unions will finally have a friend in City Hall.

But, what about Occupy Wall Street?

Remember Occupy and its takeover of Zuccotti Park almost two years ago?  Remember how Bloomberg and his police handled (and are still handling) these protestors? Do you remember showing up there, and what you said then?

The Wall Street Journal does.

Your losing opponent, Ms. Quinn, said that she would have been less “adversarial.”  Your likely Republican opponent, Mr. Lhota, said he would act more quickly “now that we know what can be done.” (More pepper spray?  More “kettling.” More arrests?)

In that same piece, you were derided for castigating Bloomberg (back to the art of denouncing things) for his heavy handed approach and proclaiming your desire to “work to build spaces where OWS and government officials could communicate and discuss ways to address their demands.”

That statement will be tested

On Tuesday morning, September 17, Occupy will once again attempt to peacefully assemble in Zuccotti Park as part of a packed, day-long celebration of its second birthday. 

On Tuesday morning, September 17, the police – soon to be your police – will be amassed, armed, and with pepper spray and kettling devices at the ready. 

What happens this day will be either Bloomberg’s final display of force, or your first demonstration of progressive rule.

Will we see you at the Park on Tuesday, Mr. De Blasio?  And, on which side of the barricades? 

Where will you draw that line in the Park?



Wall Street’s Two Least Favorite Birthdays: OWS and Everett Stern (Everett Who?)

Turn the Tide HSBC

You can be sure that TBTF (Too Big To Fail) Bankers will not be donning party hats when these two birthdays roll around: that of Occupy Wall Street on Sept. 17, 2013 when it turns two, and Everett Stern on August 29, 2013 when he turns 29.

Everett Who?

It is safe to say that 99% of the U.S. population is aware of Occupy’s birth on 9/17/11.  And, that these activists have since served as a major thorn in the side of Wall Street.  It is also safe to say that – at least of this writing – that Occupy has not inflicted mortal harm.

Everett Stern is a different matter.  He is the ultimate fear of the banking industry – an insider-turned-whistleblower.  However unknown and unacknowledged by the 99%, he may just be the one to nick that jugular.  The fact that he decided to align himself with Occupiers?  Spine-shivering.

Self-described as a “right wing Republican,” he raised eyebrows when out of exasperation he took his case of HSBC drug and terrorist money laundering to Occupy (  Essentially rebuffed elsewhere (FTC, SEC, FBI, CIA among others), he was determined to find an audience sharing at least one quality in common: a loathing of out-of-control bankers who had not only put our country into an economic tailspin, but actively aid and abet drug lords and terrorist groups. 

Stern was greeted warily by the Occupy “working group” he had chosen, called Alternative Banking.  (It can be argued that one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom-fighter, and Stein was grilled on that point.  Otherwise, he chose well.)  That meeting is chronicled here:

Since its inception in Zuccotti Park, Alt.Banking’s primary mission has been to challenge the “TBTF” designation placed on Wall Street by governmental agencies.  HSBC had been a favorite target since admitting in 2012 to a decade of money laundering for drug cartels and terrorists and being slapped with a $1.9BB fine.

The latter, without admitting guilt and arranging to see that none of its executives went to jail, infuriated Occupiers.  It just seemed hard to convince others, more conservative, of the crimes being committed.  Until Stern.

This is not a political or a “99 percent issue,” Stern emphasizes. “Banks financing drug cartels and terrorists affects every single American. I went to Occupy not because I am a major supporter of the movement. I went to Occupy because they care enough to hit the streets, carry signs and send a message that I also believe in.”

Want to Blow Out the Candles, HSBC?

After some delicate dancing, Alt.Banking and Stern united to celebrate two occasions.  The first is Everett’s 29th birthday on the steps of the NYC Public Library at 11:45 p.m. on August 29, where Stern will give a press conference detailing his grievances.  Then, with the Occupiers in tow, he will march to HSBC’s midtown offices at 425 5th Avenue to publicly vent his anger on their doorstep.

“I want a criminal indictment against HSBC,” Stern declares, “and fines are not acceptable.  What the public needs to understand is that money is still being funneled through HSBC to buy guns and kill our soldiers.”

“His intentions are pure, and his anger understandable,” one occupier opines.  “His attempts to alert governmental agencies fell on deaf ears.  We at Occupy are neither deaf nor blind and we will serve as his megaphone and ally.”

Stern is returning that favor on September 17

Alt.Banking has in mind a special birthday present, its “Occupy Finance” book ( to inflict more pain on HSBC and the banking community.  The combined effort of the group to explain the dysfunction of our financial system in plain English, it is divided into three basic parts: The Real Life Impact of Financialization on the 99%, How We Got Here, and Things to do.

Consider it “The 99% Guide to Bad Banking and What to Do About It.

The handbook will be formally presented to the public on 9/17/13 at Zuccotti Park at 3:00 p.m.  Stern, now a BFF with Alt.Banking, will be present to help hand out some 1,000 copies.

Which makes you wonder about history repeating itself

Just under two years ago, NY City’s “Finest” was successful in destroying several thousand volumes of Occupy’s own public library of activist literature.  They accomplished this wearing riot gear under the cover of darkness and with strict instructions to keep the press to away until the “clean up” was completed.

Now, in just under a month, 1,000 copies of a lone book will be handed out freely at the same park.  Given that this will take place in the daylight, and with Press invited, do you think they will be as successful?

You may want to be on hand to determine that for yourself.  Bring your party hats

Occupy’s Puppets – Tweaking the Noses of the Trans-Pacific Partnership!

Methinks there is something good afoot.  Or, “a-string,” as it were.  The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) – and the government and business interests behind a trade deal to be fast tracked into law in October without debate or amendment – is about to receive some unwanted publicity.

This coming September 17 in NYC’s famous Times Square on the second birthday of Occupy Wall Street, Occupier/Activist performers will take on the infamous TPP in a Star Wars-themed protest called Money Warz.  The Trans-Pacific Partnership will be portrayed as the “TPP Death Star” – a 15-foot-tall replica of a toilet paper roll (get it – TPP?).

The supporting cast for this “Money Warz” spectacle will feature over 200 performers, videographers, livestreamers and citizen media folk.  They will appear at public-shaming rallies to be held at select corporate headquarters, banks congressional offices, and on Wall Street itself.  That is, if they can get past the barricades manned by NYC’s Finest who serve to separate the 1% from the 99%.

Why the fuss?  Who are the “Money Warz” people, why that theme, and what is the purpose?  This was asked of OWS veterans Ted Hall, Elliot Crown and Virginia Simson doing the media outreach.
OWS Puppets Times Square

“The ‘fuss’ part is very simple,” declares Elliot.  “The TPP is touted as a ‘high-standard’ agreement specifically aimed at emerging trade issues in a dozen countries, including the U.S., Canada, Japan and Mexico.”

And, he sets off the alarm:  “Actually, the secret deal will formalize corporate rule over 40% of the global economy.  The media, and even elected officials ordinarily tasked with creating trade rules, are uninvited.  We only know its contents from leaks.”

This is no more than ‘Nafta on steroids’ – 600 corporations and their bought-and-paid-for government supporters clandestinely forging an agreement to meet the goal of controlling a country’s resources and workers.  Local laws, courtrooms and the general welfare be damned.”

“We came up with the idea to parody Star Wars as our theme…naming it ‘Money Warz,’ adds Crown.  “Our caricatures of Star Wars characters – Darth Banker, Princess Laid Off, Jebba the GMO, Emperor Pipeline, the Money Troopers, translate well into contemporary history.”

“At the mid-point of our Times Square spectacular, the ‘good guys,’ i.e., the Open Alliance characters, will kidnap the TPP Death Star and jump in waiting pedicabs to make their escape.  As might be expected, the Money Troopers will be in hot pursuit.”

“At stops along the way, performers mummified in toilet paper and wearing identifying Photo Faces masks will represent actual conspirators in these secret negotiations.  The show concludes at Wall Street when the pedicab arrives carrying the hijacked TPP Death Star and our Open Alliance heroes.”

Any notable stars?  “Yes,” Crown beams, “Noam Chomsky graciously joined us in a photo op as Chomsky Wan Kenobi for his grand kids.”

Like any other “big show” on Broadway, Star Warz is facing the classic challenge –producers need funding.  Will the initial puppet-masters get a taste of their own medicine?  Will the “TPP Death Star” paraded about Times Square on the 2nd Birthday of Occupy Wall Street counter the incessant propaganda of Main Stream Media?

Those wanting to back this show are invited to visit their Kickstarter site, view their videos of past shows ( and help them blow past their current financial goals and effectively support Money Warz in exposing Wall Street and winning a few “Tony’s.”

Well, maybe not Tony’s, but at least the gratitude of American citizens who might never experience or hear the anti-corporate side of the TPP story.

Want to contact them?  Support them?  Use, find them on twitter as @moneytroopers, and locate them via hashtags #moneywarz and #S17, #OWS, #TPP.

Better yet, show up in NYC on 9/17/13 to celebrate Occupy’s Second Birthday and to get their autographs. And, enjoy a big slice of Occupy’s Birthday Cake.

Warren Buffett’s Son, “Conscience Laundering,” and Occupy Wall Street

On Saturday, July 27, Peter Buffett, son of billionaire Warren Buffett and chairman of the NoVo Foundation, wrote a brilliant Op-Ed piece in the New York Times.  With this, he also became an instant icon and unknowing spokesperson for the Occupy Wall Street Movement.

Here’s how.

The target of his writing “The Charitable-Industrial Complex” (   is – make no mistake – the verysame 1% that Occupy has railed against from its Zuccotti Park days.  Peter’s op-editorial continues the process of revealing and damning the financial abuses and missteps of the uber rich. In this piece, he targets the “Colonialism” underlying the fashion in which the money-class seek to help the unfortunates of our world.

Peter describes sitting in meetings comprised of heads of state and investment and corporate leaders “searching for answers with the right hand to problems that others in the room have created  with their left.”

Aye, and that’s the rub.  It’s how the system is wired, Peter.  Big Business and Bad Government essentially collude to distract the onlooker from noticing their complicity in creating the problems of the 99%.  They do this with nicely publicized campaigns which tout the corporate imbued solutions – even though what they provide is all too often clearly out of touch with the needs being addressed.

But, like Wall Street, corporate charitable giving certainly qualifies as an enterprise that reflects their world:  big and profitable.  And, growing.

As described by Peter, the growth rate of the nonprofit sector over the past several years exceeds that of either the business or government sectors and employs more than 9.4 million people!  All this provides the machinery to perform the mighty task of giving away over $300 billion annually.  What is not mentioned, is the fact that only a small portion of the donations actually reaches the people or projects for which they are intended.

CharityNavigator.Org, America’s leading independent charity evaluator, has determined that nine out of ten charities spend at least 65% of their contributions (revenue) on overhead.  Only 35% of monies received reach their target.

This is where Occupy steps in, with expectedly different approaches and mechanisms.  Occupy has been declaring over the past almost three years of its existence that almost anything that Wall Street touches is self-serving.  Or, as Peter describes it, “conscience laundering.”

More insidiously, he questioned the consequence of this Janus-faced system in that the poor are assisted in improving their condition so as to make better, future consumers – echoing another Occupy complaint.

“People will rise above making $2 a day to enter our world of goods and services so they can buy more.  But, doesn’t all this just feed the beast?” Peter asks.  “Money should be spent trying out concepts that shatter current structures and systems that have turned much of the world into one vast market.”

Peter Meet Occupy – “People Bailing Out People”

In October, 2012, I was approached by a working group affiliated with Occupy’s Strike Debt ( team to consult to them to help locate and purchase medical debt for the purpose of “forgiving” it.  The motivation behind this effort was twofold.  First, to remove a person’s debt from the marketplace (yes, there is a marketplace for debt) so that this person would never hear from a bill collector, and secondly, to draw America’s attention to the very nature of debt itself.

Being semi-retired from the collections industry, knowledgeable, and available, I accepted an advisory role on the project named “Rolling Jubilee” ( (RJ) and introduced this team to the little-known fraternity of the buying and selling of medical debt.

What I appreciated is that, at the outset, it was determined that this effort would be professional and compliant with any and all rules and regulations affecting their mission.  RJ incarnated itself as a 503(c )4 corporation, complete with a Board of Advisors and managers, lawyers and accountants.

Then, with the modest expectation of raising $50,000 – which would translate, at a penny on the dollar as sold in that industry, into the forgiveness of $5,000,000 in debt – Strike Debt staged an evening of fund-raising on November 15, 2012.  The show was pure Occupy – Facebook and Twitter were liberally employed to get out the word.  OWS techies livestreamed the event over the Internet to the Occupy faithful with this plea – help us help others.

The actual results were astounding.  Over the next several days, weeks and months, RJ went about raising almost $600,000 and will shortly announce a very significant buy in medical debt.  All of which will be forgiven in full.

Peter Buffett – Take Note

All of this fundraising and the task of buying and abolishing debt is being done for an aggregate cost of less that 6% of the dollars collected – a program cost that, to my awareness, few existing fund-raising institution can match.

There’s neither cost nor need for vanity press or champagne-and-shrimp dinner evenings in which handsomely-suited and gorgeously-dressed society members thump their collective chests for helping the needy.

Only a host of volunteers and a board, none of which are compensated for their work.  Brokers and web developers are paid.  These people are not volunteers, but individuals who have essential areas of expertise.  Even in these cases, services are billed often well below market value.

“They” may have been bailed out.  “We” may have been sold out.  But, this is one of many unheralded example as to how the Occupy Movement continues to quietly grow in influence, power and results created.

But, back to Peter’s Op-Ed and an answer to his plea for a “new operating system…built from the ground up.”  It’s Occupy.  And, now that it has an uncommon ally of such stature and eloquence, perhaps it can receive the respect it deserves.

Until then, I salute Mr. Buffett as being a very, very unusual member of the 1%.